Utility Detection & Mapping

Choose the utility workflow around the job

From straightforward service avoidance and immediate mark-out to professional multi-frequency mapping, UTSI provides different GPR workflows for different operators, sites and survey deliverables.

01
e-Safe Simplified service avoidance without conventional radargram interpretation.
Avoidance
02
e-Spade Lite Immediate mark-out and conventional utility-mapping workflows.
Mark-out
03
GroundVue Configurable channels, frequencies and professional radar data.
Mapping
01 Service avoidance e-Safe provides a simplified likelihood-based workflow for pre-excavation avoidance work.
02 Immediate mark-out e-Spade Lite supports field interpretation, marking and utility mapping using conventional radar information.
03 Professional mapping GroundVue provides multi-frequency, multi-channel and configurable professional survey capability.
04 Combined evidence GPR complements EML, records, site observations and appropriate physical verification.

Select by Field Outcome

Three utility workflows for different users and deliverables

Start with the decision the operator must make in the field, then select the system that provides the appropriate level of guidance, radar information and configuration.

e-Safe, e-Spade Lite and GroundVue are not simply different sizes of the same product. They are designed around different operating workflows and levels of GPR interpretation.
01

Straightforward service avoidance

e-Safe

A practical pre-excavation workflow that presents processed likelihood information rather than requiring the operator to interpret a conventional radargram.

  • Designed for service-avoidance tasks
  • LOG single-line and PRO multi-line workflows
  • Clearer operation for non-specialist GPR users
  • Supports traceable field records
Avoidance Guided workflow
Explore e-Safe
02

Immediate mark-out and utility mapping

e-Spade Lite

A folding, field-portable GPR system for operators who require visible radar information, immediate mark-out and conventional utility-mapping capability.

  • Immediate Mark Out workflow
  • Utility Mapping workflow
  • XPM2 and UP400 antenna configurations
  • Folding format for transport and storage
Mark-out Radargram
Explore e-Spade Lite
03

Configurable professional GPR

GroundVue

Professional systems for experienced operators who require direct access to radar data, multiple frequencies, configurable channels and specialist survey arrangements.

  • TriVue simultaneous 250, 500 and 1000 MHz collection
  • GV3 modular one to eight-channel configurations
  • Professional positioning and data workflows
  • Custom carts, frames and antenna arrangements
TriVue GV3
Explore GroundVue

Why Use GPR

GPR adds a different source of subsurface information

Across simplified avoidance, immediate mark-out and professional mapping workflows, GPR can complement electromagnetic locating, records and other survey evidence.

01

Use GPR alongside electromagnetic locating

GPR is not normally used as a standalone clearance method. Instead, it complements electromagnetic locating, records and other survey techniques by providing a different form of subsurface information.

02

Investigate non-conductive services

Plastic pipes, drainage, fibre-optic routes and other non-conductive targets may not respond to conventional electromagnetic locating but can produce a radar response.

03

Collect continuous survey information

Radar data can be collected continuously along a survey line, supporting the identification of utility routes, crossings and other changes beneath the surface.

04

Match the system to the required survey

Antenna frequency, channel count, positioning method, data density and reporting requirements should be selected around the site and expected targets.

Diagram showing ground penetrating radar detecting a buried utility

Professional Utility Mapping · Antenna Frequency

One frequency may not detect every utility

Antenna frequency affects target definition and penetration. A mid-range antenna can provide useful general utility information, while a higher-frequency antenna can improve the definition of smaller and shallower targets.

01

Mid-range frequency

Commonly used for general utility investigation where a balance between depth and target definition is required.

02

Higher frequency

Shorter wavelengths can improve the visibility of smaller, closely spaced or shallow targets, including telecommunications and fibre-optic routes.

03

Multi-frequency survey

Combining frequency ranges provides a broader view of the subsurface than relying on one antenna alone.

Professional Utility Mapping · System Configuration

Select single or multi-channel collection around the site

The appropriate configuration depends on the survey area, expected utilities, available access and the required collection speed.

01

Flexible Entry Configuration

Single channel

A single-channel system allows one antenna to be used at a time, with antennas changed when another frequency is required.

  • Lower system complexity
  • Suitable for targeted survey work
  • Antennas can be changed between survey passes
  • Useful where access or space is limited
Requires separate passes where multiple frequencies are needed.
03

Large-Area Survey

Array configuration

Wider multi-channel configurations can increase coverage and data density for large-area utility investigation.

  • Greater survey width
  • Higher collection productivity
  • Dense survey-line spacing
  • Application-specific frame design
Contact UTSI to confirm current channel and frame options.

Survey Accuracy

Accurate results require accurate positioning and calibration

Radar records travel time very precisely, but reliable utility position and depth information depends on the wider survey method.

01

Horizontal position

GPS, total-station information, survey reference lines or a distance encoder can be used to record where the radar data was collected.

02

Transmission velocity

Radar records reflection time. Converting that time into depth requires an appropriate estimate or measurement of wave velocity through the surveyed material.

03

Site calibration

Velocity varies between sites and with material and moisture conditions. Site-specific calibration improves depth estimates.

04

Resolution limits

Target separation and minimum detectable size are influenced by wavelength, frequency, target geometry and surrounding conditions.

Equipment Deployment

Adapt the collection method to the survey surface

Utility detection is commonly completed using a trolley, but different deployment methods can be considered for large areas, rough ground and restricted access.

01

Trolley mounted

A push-along trolley is suitable for many roads, pavements, yards and construction sites and supports controlled survey-line collection.

02

Vehicle mounted

Vehicle or trailer mounting may be considered where larger areas must be covered efficiently and the survey environment allows higher collection speeds.

03

Hand-towed or specialist frame

Hand-towed antennas and adapted frames can support survey work over rough surfaces, embankments or areas where a standard trolley is unsuitable.

Fibre-Optic Detection

Fibre-optic routes are not automatically invisible to GPR

GPR does not detect the electrical signal inside a cable. It responds to changes in material properties and target geometry. A suitable high-frequency antenna can improve the possibility of imaging smaller and shallower fibre-optic installations.

Match wavelength to expected target size
Use higher frequency for smaller shallow targets
Combine frequencies where target types vary
Confirm anomalies using the wider survey method

Survey Limitations

When results are poor, identify the technical reason

GPR performance depends on the equipment settings, site materials, moisture, target size and the relationship between wavelength and the expected utilities.

01

Conductive ground

Salt water and some wet clays can absorb radar energy, reducing the amount of signal returned to the receiver and limiting useful investigation depth.

02

Incorrect depth window

Data beyond the selected recording window cannot be recovered later. The collection settings must allow sufficient travel time for the expected target depth.

03

Moisture and rainfall

Groundwater and recent rainfall can alter transmission velocity and effective penetration, affecting both depth interpretation and survey settings.

04

Unsuitable frequency

A wavelength that is too long may not resolve small or closely spaced targets. A very high frequency may improve resolution but reduce achievable depth.

Survey Workflow

Plan the survey around the required deliverable

Establish the required survey standard, target types, positioning accuracy and reporting output before data collection begins.

01

Define the requirement

Confirm the area, expected services, target depth, required survey standard and final deliverable.

02

Select the configuration

Choose the antenna frequencies, channel count, positioning method and deployment arrangement.

03

Collect and review

Survey in suitable orientations, monitor data quality and adjust settings where site conditions require it.

04

Interpret and verify

Combine the radar results with EML, records, site evidence and appropriate physical verification.

Important Safety Information

A GPR survey does not provide excavation clearance

Utility detection results should be used as part of a wider safe-dig and survey process that includes appropriate records, electromagnetic locating, competent interpretation, visual inspection, physical verification and applicable industry guidance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common utility-detection questions

Contact UTSI for system-selection guidance based on the site, target utilities and required survey output.

Does GPR replace electromagnetic locating?
No. Professional utility detection normally combines multiple sources of information. GPR complements electromagnetic locating by responding to different target and material properties.
Can GPR detect plastic pipes?
It can respond to plastic pipes and other non-conductive targets where sufficient contrast exists between the target and the surrounding material. Detection is not guaranteed in every ground condition.
Which antenna frequency should be used?
The selection depends on target size, expected depth, ground conditions and required resolution. Multi-frequency collection can be valuable where both shallow small targets and deeper utilities are important.
Can GPR detect fibre-optic cables?
Fibre-optic routes can produce a radar response. A higher-frequency antenna can improve target definition for smaller shallow targets, although performance remains dependent on the installation and surrounding material.
How is utility depth calculated?
GPR records reflection time. Converting time into depth requires an estimate or measurement of the radar-wave velocity through the surveyed material. Site calibration improves the reliability of the estimate.
Why might GPR perform poorly on a site?
Possible causes include conductive ground, wet clay, salt water, recent rainfall, unsuitable frequency, insufficient recording depth, small targets or inadequate survey density.

Choose the Right Utility Workflow

Start with the field outcome, not only the antenna frequency

Select a straightforward avoidance workflow, immediate mark-out and utility mapping, or a configurable professional GPR system according to the operator, site and required deliverable.